![]() There, truly, isn't a good argument for the GMA950, no matter how much ram it steals from the rest of the computer.unless you work in the integrated graphics dept. I am sure that you will argue that a redesign is costly.the mini should have been designed with dedicated graphics in the first place. A graphics card or chipset that can triple the performance costs same. If Apple IS going to continue with integrated graphics.let's pull the hardware from the shelves that don't have dust on them.and put the GMA950 in the graveyard where it belongs. It seemed so far away when, in June last year, Apple announced their two-year transition to Intel architectures it also didnt exactly add up. I am sure you will argue that the GMA950 is more compatable with some new core items, but remember the 9200 is ancient.and was never brought forward and ended it's life with the 9550. Impressive numbers, but the GMA950 doen't even deliver the performance of the old 32MB 9200 G4 iBook. Would you rather have a mini with 64MB of dedicated graphics, or Apple allowing the mini to use the maximum 224MB of video memory that the Intel integrated graphics are capable of?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |